A Light
Gathering of Dust

A woman approaching forty revisits her hometown. After years of living in another country, she comes seeking answers from an old friend and her former lover…

Cast Breakdown
2 women, 1 man
Setting
Contemporary Europe
Running time
75 minutes

A woman approaching forty revisits her hometown. After years of living in another country, she comes seeking answers from an old friend and her former lover…

A Light Gathering of Dust is an intimate tale of personal betrayal and political intrigue for three actors.
“Welcome to a world that not only encourages, but institutionalises betrayal, where one’s emotions are as suppressed as one’s political views, and where change does not bring any real progress. Minimal set and props open up the acting space, where three actors’ compelling interplay … rolls towards an inevitable ending. In this space, political becomes personal, and all layers of emotion, secrets and hidden hypocrisies are stripped like worn out clothes, until all one is left with is the naked truth.”
Ksenija Horvat, edinburghguide.com

Contains scenes of a sexual nature.
Premiered by NXT, at the Gateway Theatre, Edinburgh Festival, 2001.
Revived by Potomac Theatre Project (PTP/NYC), Atlantic Stage 2, New York, 2011.

“It is estimated that during the brief history of the German Democratic Republic (1945-1990) close to one in fifty of the total population ‘co-operated’ in some capacity with the secret police (Stasi) in spying on his/her own friends, neighbours and families.

After the fall of the Berlin Wall and the re-unification of Germany, a substantial portion of Stasi files were made public. A distinctive feature of these open files was the large black lines which obliterated any information the new regime considered ‘delicate’.

The repercussions from this process of de-Stasification are still being felt today.”

Above is the playwright’s note that appeared in the programme for the original Edinburgh production back in 2001, when that last line carried a little more weight perhaps. I was pleased to note that audience members for the 2011 New York revival identified the non-specific setting of the production as any number of post-revolutionary societies: Chile, South Africa, Iraq …  any state in which personal betrayal has been effectively institutionalised.

“Dykes’ script smacks of dark Milan Kundera and Englishby’s fine piano and cello score evokes a sadly waltzing atmosphere.”

The ScotsmanEdinburgh, August 2001

“An intelligently written and directed piece … The compelling interplay is enhanced by Englishby’s evocative original score … This is a brave show in many ways. It will move you and make you think.”

The Edinburgh GuideEdinburgh, August 2001

“The story at the heart of a light gathering of dust concerns a triangle of lovers … and how one decides to inform upon the other two. The reason for her betrayal is both personal and political -- in fact, under the constant pressure of surveillance, it is impossible to unknot the two. What the opening of the files does is fill the air with the dust that comes from excavated secrets, breathed in and breathed out, and these three are forced to unify within themselves what their [reunified country] tells them about who they were, are, and hope to be ... As is always the case with anything the Potomac Theatre Project creates, the production values are excellent, the direction is sure-handed, and the acting is vibrant, spacious, and assured ... Mr. Dykes strikes the right balance between revelation and mystery, and it is a delight to watch the ease with which the three actors navigate the time and emotional shifts of the play.”

Michael BettencourtScene4 Magazine, New York, July 2011

CHARACTERS

CHARACTERS

“They restricted our movements. Confiscated our books. Censored our papers. Invaded our homes. … Do you? Do you know? I’m not sure you do! Or else you’ve forgotten! … She did this to us. She. She did it.”
1
“I can’t say what it is. This thing I have done. This thing has no name. No texture. It has no colour. It has no taste. There’s no matter to it. Invisible particles. Dancing in air. Lining our lungs. It’s done. I’m tired. You want to know? Then read the file.”
2
“The majority have prospered. So we’re told. And yes, I will concede some chains are broken. But if you’re asking: is this the outcome I envisioned? Are these the fruits I laboured for? I tell you frankly. No. They’re not.”
3

GALLERY

Photographs from the 2011 New York production.